翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Decibully
・ DeCicco
・ DeCicco v. Schweizer
・ Decidability
・ Decidability (logic)
・ Decidability of first-order theories of the real numbers
・ Decennatherium
・ Decennial liability
・ Decennier
・ Decennium Dum Expletur
・ Decent Days and Nights
・ Decent Homes Standard
・ Decent Parties
・ Decent work
・ Decent Work for Decent Pay
Decent Working Conditions and Fair Competition Act
・ Decentius
・ Decentius (magister officiorum)
・ Decentralisation in France
・ Decentralised system
・ Decentralist Party
・ Decentralist Party of the South
・ Decentralization
・ Decentralization Coalition
・ Decentralization policy in K League
・ Decentralization process in Peru
・ Decentralized Administration of Attica
・ Decentralized Administration of Crete
・ Decentralized Administration of Epirus and Western Macedonia
・ Decentralized Administration of Macedonia and Thrace


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Decent Working Conditions and Fair Competition Act : ウィキペディア英語版
Decent Working Conditions and Fair Competition Act

The Decent Working Conditions and Fair Competition Act is the title of several bills that have been introduced in the United States Congress to try to "prohibit the import, export, and sale of goods made with sweatshop labor". As of February 2009, they have all died in committee and thus not become law.
== 109th Congress ==

In the 109th Congress (January 2005 to January 2007, both houses Republican) the Senate bill had number S 3485 and the house bill had number HR 5635. They both died in committee. The senate version was introduced by Byron Dorgan (D-ND)〔http://dorgan.senate.gov/newsroom/record.cfm?id=256778〕 on June 8, 2006. The house version was introduced by Sherrod Brown (D-OH)〔http://www.sherrodbrown.com/tag/content/C66/〕 on June 6, 2006.〔GovTrack, S. 3485〕
The bill was written as a collaboration of different groups, including the United Steelworkers of America, the National Labor Committee and Senator Dorgan, partially in response to a Harris Poll showing that 75% of Americans agreed with the following statement: "I want my Member of Congress to support legislation to protect human rights in the global economy by prohibiting the import or sale of sweatshop goods in the U.S. which were made under conditions violating internationally recognized worker rights standards."〔http://www.nlcnet.org/article.php?id=75〕
In September 2006, the bill had garnered four Senate co-sponsors and 33 co-sponsors in the House.〔http://www.usw.org/usw/program/content/3103.php〕 It was also endorsed by the AFL-CIO〔http://www.aflcio.org/aboutus/thisistheaflcio/ecouncil/ec08082006b.cfm〕
The bill aimed to ban the sale of any goods deemed to be made in contravention of either core International Labor Organization standards, including the right to organize and freedom of association, or of local labor laws. The bill's backers stated that the law was written specifically to ensure its compliance with World Trade Organization rules on non-discrimination, as the bill would have also banned the sale of any goods made in America under substandard conditions. Furthermore, endorsers claimed that the bill would have treated all goods equally and held all countries, including the United States, accountable for the conditions under which goods are made.〔http://www.nlcnet.org/live/article.php?id=35〕
The contents of the bill can be found at the Library of Congress, or on their website at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:S.3485.IS:
House Representative Sherrod Brown, D OH, described the bill in these terms:
The bill is simple. It bars the importation or the sale of goods made with sweatshop labor. In other words, if a product is made in a Chinese sweatshop, if a product is made by child labor or slave labor or prison labor, you can't import it into the United States, you can't sell it into the United States
 
The Federal Trade Commission would enforce it, but the bill also gives retailers and shareholders the right to hold violators accountable, and it prohibits Federal government agencies from buying sweatshop goods. We can't afford to continue to tolerate these abuses. We certainly cannot afford, cannot continue to encourage them.
 
We don't have a $200 billion trade deficit with China because China's companies are better than ours and certainly not because their people are smarter or more dedicated or hard working. We know how China is able to do so well in the game of international trade. They break the rules. - House Floor, Jun 27 2006〔Congressionial Record, House, Jun 27 2006〕

... and on June 22, 2006, like this:
China is the world's sweatshop leader, with repressive labor policies resulting in wage suppression of as much as 85 percent. We all know that American workers can compete in a global economy on a level playing field, but no one can compete with prison labor, child labor or sweatshop labor. The result, a U.S. trade deficit with China that breaks records year after year, an increasing loss of U.S. manufacturing jobs to China. In my State alone, in Ohio, 42,000 jobs have been lost to China since the year 2001. Much of that job loss has been as a result of China's unfair trade practices. Yet America's trade agreements are actually encouraging the development of new sweatshops....
 
The bill bars the importation, the exportation or the sale of goods made with prisoner sweatshop labor. In other words, if a product is made by child labor or by forced prison camp labor, you can't import it into the United States, you can't sell it in the United States....
 
We cannot afford to continue to turn a blind eye to these abuses. Sweatshop imports are a moral crime. They violate the values of our families, of our faith and of the history of this country. They are a moral crime against the working men and women, and, I am afraid, working children of the developing nations.
 
Sweatshop imports are economic suicide for our country. As we import sweatshop goods, we export American jobs, we weaken the bargaining position of U.S. workers fighting for wages with which they can actually support their families.
 
The heart of America's economy has always been a vigorous middle-income consumer class. Henry Ford knew that. That is why he paid his workers a wage that would allow them to buy the cars that they made, to share the wealth they create, to buy the cars that they made.
 
By driving U.S. wages down, we weaken the American consumer market, we undercut our greatest economic power, and we lose jobs in so many of our communities....〔Congressional Record, House, Jun 22 2006〕


抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Decent Working Conditions and Fair Competition Act」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.